Software Fail Presentation Rubric

1-10 rating, from very weak (1) to superior (10).

Aspect Range Comments GradeSorted ascending
Introduction
  • Gives background of failure
  • Defines objectives of presentation
  • Good summary the relevant aspects of the failure.
1-10    
Preparation
  • Careful preparation evident
  • Evidence of participation of every member in preparation.
1-10    
Teamwork
  • All members contribute to presentation
  • Evidence of collaboration and cohesiveness
  • Evidence that all members grasp failure and it's implications
1-10    
Organization
  • Well organized, including introduction, objectives, background and support, explanation and evidence, conclusions
1-10    
Coverage and Knowledge
  • Complete and accurate coverage of salient aspects of the failure and related project
  • Good use of supporting material
  • Clear understanding and explanation of salient issues
1-10    
Audio/Visual
  • Images/figures are clear and understandable.
  • The text is readable and clear.
  • Audio/Visual components support the main points of the talk.
  • Appropriate referencing of data that is/was not generated by presenter
1-10    
Conclusion
  • Good recap and summery of significant conclusions.
  • References
1-10    
Total 7-70    
Topic revision: r1 - 2018-04-09 - JimSkon
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback